Until I said to him this which Rav Yehudoh said, ‘a border which was possessed, etc.’ - עד דאמרי ליה הא דאמר רב יהודה מיצר שהחזיקו כולי
Summary:
The claim of ר"פ was based on the fact that it was a מצר שהחזיקו בו רבים (the view of ר"ח וריב"ם) and the sixteen אמות refers to the width of a רה"ר, or (according to the ר"ת) the dispute was regarding the ownership of the roots.
Rather here it is by growths that came afterwards - אלא הכא בגידולין הבאין לאחר מכאן
Summary:
We do not resolve the query; however, we do resolve the apparent contradiction between the רישא and the סיפא according to both sides of the query. The ר"ח maintains that the query is resolved and the סיפא only, is discussing גידולין הבאין לאחר מכאן.
Rahveenoh said, there is no difficulty; here it is within sixteen, etc. - רבינא אמר לא קשיא כאן תוך ט"ז כולי
Summary:
Within ט"ז אמה we go בתר אילן (and nevertheless by הדיוט לתוך הקדש לא נהנין) and לא מועלין, and חוץ לט"ז we go בתר קרקע (and nevertheless by הקדש לתוך הדיוט לא נהנין), which we would not have known if both cases were either תוך ט"ז or חוץ לט"ז.
He is a robber and we do not bring Beekurim from it - גזלן הוא ואין מביאין ממנו בכורים
Summary:
עולא maintains (according to פר"ח) that one is not permitted to be סומך within sixteen אמות therefore if was סומך he is a גזלן and cannot bring ביכורים. While רש"י explains that even though it is מותר לסמוך, nevertheless he cannot bring ביכורים (according to עולא), since it is not מארצך.
Ten saplings which are spread out, etc. - עשר נטיעות המפוזרות כולי
Summary:
The rule of עשר נטיעות (as well as ערבה וניסוך המים) is a הלל"מ. It is applicable only if there are exactly ten saplings for a בית סאה, no more and no less.
