Amud 67b

תוס' ד"ה אף

Also by ‘stolen’, there is no remedy - אף גזול דלית ליה תקנתא

Summary:
לית ליה תקנתא means in its present condition (but not if the animal becomes mature later [when it may be brought as a קרבן]).

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה רבא

Rovo said, from here; ‘his Korbon’, but not a stolen one - רבא אמר מהכא קרבנו ולא הגזול

Summary:
It is רבא (not רבה) who maintains יאוש לא קני.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה שור

Shor and Seh two times - שור ושה שני פעמים

Summary:
The duplicity of שור alone could have meant the exclusion of other animals from the payment of שור, but not from the payment of שה.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה חמשה

He should pay five oxen in its stead - חמשה בקר ישלם תחתיו

Summary:
Logic dictates that for selling a שור one pays for a שור, not for a שה; and vice versa.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה אין

The thief, etc. does not, etc. - אין הגונב כולי

Summary:
We can derive from the פסוק of וגונב מבית האיש that הגונב מן הגנב is פטור from כפל, only according to the מ"ד that it is discussing גנב עצמו, not טוען טענת גנב.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה דתניא

For we learnt; Rabi Akivoh said, etc. - דתניא אמר רבי עקיבא כולי

Summary:
The גמרא asked the question regarding יאוש by גנב וגזלן according to what רבה ורב were discussing respectively, even though there is no logic to differentiate between them. Alternately; the questions were recorded as they were originally posed.

[View / Print]