Amud 22a

תוס' ד"ה עציץ

A flowerpot belonging to one, and the plants belonging to another - עציץ של אחד וזרעים של אחר

Summary:
There is a novelty that the בעל העציץ does not acquire the זרעים which are in his עציץ.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה החזיק

He took possession of the plants, he acquired the flowerpot - החזיק בזרעים קנה עציץ

Summary:
תוספות is uncertain whether אגב וקני is required by an עציץ and a שטר.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה בתר

We follow its perforation - בתר נקבו אזלינן

Summary:
The nourishment that the plant receives from the ground by an עציץ נקוב is greater than the nourishment it receives from the ground through its branches.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה ובדאשרוש

And do they not argue when it took root; but be learnt, ‘two gardens, etc.' -ובדאשרוש לא פליגי והתנן שתי גנות כולי

Summary:
Initially we assumed that the basis of the מחלוקת between ר"מ ור"י (is not who can destroy the plant, but rather it) is whether we follow the root or the plant.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה לא

Not on erased paper - לא על נייר מחוק

Summary:
One can distinguish between a single erasure and a double erasure.

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה שלש

There are three hides - שלש עורות הן

Summary:
קלף is not mentioned either because it is not considered ‘hide’ anymore (רש"י), or because its שיעור was already explicitly mentioned in a משנה elsewhere ('תוס).

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה כדי

In order to write a Get on it - כדי לכתוב עליו את הגט

Summary:
The שיעורים of the various עורות depends on their usage [and דיפתרא (according to the חכמים) is used to write גיטין].

[View / Print]

תוס' ד"ה מאן

Who are the Chachomim; Rabi Elozor - מאן חכמים רבי אלעזר

Summary:
A woman must bring ע"מ (according to ר"א), only if it is a כתב שיכול להזדייף, otherwise we can rely on the ע"ח. According to ר"מ even if she brings עדים that nothing was changed it is not effective since it is not מוכח מתוכו (רש"י seems to disagree).

[View / Print]