Either way; if the betrothal of Re’uvain, etc. - מה נפשך אי קידושי ראובן כולי
Summary:
The ספק is either whether she was ever מקודשת לראשון (the view of רש"י), or whether the שחרור was מפקיע the קידושין לראשון (the view of תוספות).
The betrothal of the first one is completed - גמרו קידושי ראשון
Summary:
The difference between חשוחב"ח (where the קידושין may expand) and בהמה של ב' שותפין (where it does not) is that a בהמה can be both half הקדש and half חולין, but a woman cannot be half מקודשת, or by a בהמה he was שייר, but not by the חשוחב"ח.
But if he wrote a document for him; that is his emancipation - אבל אם כתב עליו אונו זהו שחרורו
Summary:
According to אמימר, if the master has no monetary interest in the עבד (when he is מפקיר him) a שטר שחרור will not be effective; nevertheless it is effective by המוכר עבדו לנכרי, since the owner retains the monetary rights of קנס and וולדות.
Summary:
According to רש"י the term לגופא means that the עבד can eventually wind up by the נכרי completely and in the meantime he works for him, while לפירות means that eventually the ישראל will only have פירות, but currently he receives nothing. תוספות maintains that in both cases he receives the פירות now but the גוף of the עבד is by the נכרי, while the גוף of the שדה is still by the נכרי.
