But there are witnesses in Ooris - והאיכא סהדי באורית
Summary:
We are certainly not concerned that there may be עדים, elsewhere; if we know that there are עדים elsewhere, it should be investigated. If there is a rumor that there are עדים elsewhere; that is the dispute between רב חסדא and the רבנן.
Summary:
There is more reason to be lenient by a שבויה than by א"א because; a. A שבויה makes an effort not be contaminated, as opposed to our case of א"א; and b. שבויה in only אסורה מדרבנן, while an א"א is אסורה מדאורייתא. The איסור of שבויה can lead to a חיוב מיתה if the son was עובד עבודה בביהמ"ק on שבת.
And for one who nullifies a גט, etc. - ועל דמבטל גיטא
Summary:
רש"י maintains that the ביטול was in the presence of the שליח, and the concern is that the שליח will give her the גט מבוטל. However תוספות maintains that the ביטול was שלא בפניהם and the concern is either that if we maintain בטלו מבוטל, she may remarry, or that there will be a לעז on this גט. For תוספות cannot accept that if בטלו בפני השליח that the שליח would give it to the wife.
רב did not flog for all of those cases - בכולהו לא מנגיד רב
Summary:
Nowadays young couples (may) live with their in-laws, because [נהרדעי maintain that רב was not מנגיד for this, and] today the financial benefits incurred dispels any suspicions that there may be an illicit relationship.
Summary:
ר"ת maintains that the פריצות of קידושי ביאה is that we are setting aside עדי ביאה; while the ר"י maintains that the פריצות is that the initial קנין is בביאה.