The master said specifically, he does not agree with this ruling of Shmuel - בפירוש אמר מר לא סבירא ליה להא דשמואל
Summary:
The ruling is like (עולא and) רבינא (who is סוף הוראה) that a קטנה שנתקדשה שלא לדעת אביה does not require even מיאון. We are permitted to accept קידושין for a קטנה whose father traveled overseas (she should not be הפקר).
And she will be found to be a stranger retroactively -
ונמצאת זרה למפרע
Summary:
The איסור אכילת תרומה for an ארוסה applies even when the reasons for this prohibition מדרבנן do not apply, since her כניסה לחופה can be invalidated by the father; therefore she is still considered an ארוסה, and the חכמים apply their גזירה to all ארוסות.
There was an occurrence, and Rav was concerned for this ruling of Rav Ahsee - הוה עובדא וחש לה רב להא דרב אסי
Summary:
There is a dispute in תוספות whether the הלכה is like רב אסי since רב retracted, or the הלכה is like רב, for he did not retract, he was merely מחמיר for himself.
We place the money in the possession of its owner - אוקי ממונא בחזקת מריה
Summary:
The wife’s heirs receive her נכסי מלוג, even if the husband seized them (for it was a תפיסא שלא כדין); the reason she eats תרומה is because מדאורייתא an ארוסה may eat תרומה.
